REMI is not open to the public. There are two ways in: apply as a practitioner, or be invited by one who is already in the cohort.
The first version of REMI is being built with a deliberately small group: fifteen practitioners, chosen one conversation at a time. They are not beta testers on a mailing list — they shape what gets built, and in what order.
Through the contact form on the public site. Tell us about your practice and what happens to your recommendations after a consultation — that is the application, and it is read by a founder rather than a form.
A real conversation, not a screening call. Places are reviewed personally: we are looking for engaged practitioners rather than sign-ups.
Access is arranged with you directly during the pilot — there is no self-service sign-up page, on purpose.
Expect us to ask for your feedback every couple of weeks. That exchange is the point of the pilot, not a courtesy.
You can leave the pilot whenever you want. Pilot terms — including what it will cost — are being worked out with the first practitioners rather than announced to them, so you will not find a number on any REMI page until there is a real one.
You cannot join REMI on your own, and that is deliberate: without a practitioner's recommendations behind it, there is no plan for REMI to support. You arrive through the practitioner who supports you, and they invite you.
There is one front door for all of this — the contact form on the public site. The founders answer it themselves.
Get in touchThese two buttons record nothing — there is no feedback pipeline behind them yet, and a control that quietly discards an answer is worse than none. Until there is one, tell us in a sentence and it reaches a person.
Tell us insteadRead next