From consultation notes to the plan on your screen: what REMI structures, what your practitioner confirms, and what never reaches you.
Nothing appears in your space that your practitioner has not signed off. The path from their notes to your screen has one gate in it, and they hold it.
Your practitioner listens, decides and writes their notes exactly the way they already do. REMI changes nothing about that, and never edits what they wrote.
It reads the notes and proposes a list of separate recommendations, each with a title, a short detail and a category — nutrition, habit, supplement, activity or follow-up.
They tick what is right and untick what is not. Anything unticked stays a draft and never leaves their screen. This is the gate: REMI proposes, a human decides.
Publishing sends the confirmed recommendations into your space, where they become your plan, your meals for the week and your steps. Publishing a new plan replaces the previous one.
Your side of REMI filters drafts out rather than trusting that only confirmed ones were ever written. If a recommendation was discussed in the consultation but is not in your plan, your practitioner has not confirmed it — ask them, rather than assuming it was lost.
A plan is not permanent. It carries a review date, and your practitioner can publish a new one after any consultation — or before the next one, if something is clearly not working. When they do, the new plan replaces the old one in full, so what you see is always the current version rather than an archive you have to read backwards.
There is no messaging between you and your practitioner in REMI today — secure messaging is designed but not built. If a recommendation does not work for you, tell them the way you already do, by their usual channel or at the next consultation.
These two buttons record nothing — there is no feedback pipeline behind them yet, and a control that quietly discards an answer is worse than none. Until there is one, tell us in a sentence and it reaches a person.
Tell us insteadRead next